Re: [tsc-devel] General Team Discussion in IRC

Sydney Dykstra | Mon, 02 Mar 2015 13:19:20 UTC

That should work for me, but as always, i cannot garuntee anything.

-Sydney
On 03/02/2015 08:01 AM, Chris Jacobsen wrote:
> We might consider posting this in a github ticket -- some people use 
> neither the forums nor the mailing list or check them infrequently. 
> Hopefully this will start to be less of an issue when we move off 
> github :)
>
> -datahead
>
>
> On Monday, March 2, 2015 6:19 AM, Quintus <…s@q…> wrote:
>
>
>
> (I’m also going to post this on the forums)
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> it has turned out that there are some issues regarding TSC lying around
> that should be resolved once and for all by having a larger general
> discussion in IRC on them. The main issue is probably what has been
> suggested by datahead in IRC recently, namely the handling of the 2.x
> development branch after the 2.0.0 release. Apart from that there are
> some further issues we ought to discuss, and I think best way to do that
> is to have everyone from the team join an organised (i.e. ordered by
> topics) IRC discussion session. This requires first and foremost to find
> a date and time that allows every team member to join. I suggest the
> following for now:
>
>                     2015-03-21  20:00:00 UTC
>
> Please object immediately if you know you are unavailable at this date
> or time.
>
> Discussion schedule until now:
>
> 1. Determing the voting process (proponent: Quintus)
> 2. Maintenance of the 2.x branch and opening of the 3.x branch
>   (proponent: datahead)
> 3. Release date of the 2.0.0 release (proponent: Quintus)
> 4. Translation tools and services (proponent: Quintus)
>
> PLEASE SUBMIT MORE TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION! We don’t have the entire team
> in real-time chat that often. Take this opportunity and submit some
> topic that needs discussion and a binding result.
>
> As usual, for each topic we shall try to find a consent. If this isn’t
> possible, we shall vote on the topic. As we’ve not yet defined a proper
> voting process, I’ve put that topic first on the schedule, and am going
> to propose a voting procedure. By popular demand I’ll make a hopefully
> more easy suggestion than what I send to the mailinglist recently (needs
> are different in IRC anyway).
>
> I’ll post a more complete announcement with more detailed information on
> each of the topics and IRC modalities once we have the topics list
> complete by say, 2015-03-16. Please object if you don’t like this
> deadline.
>
> If you submit a topic, thus please give a short paragraph of overview
> that I can include into that announcement then so that even those people
> who don’t have followed this discussion can get a short overview of
> what’s going to be going on.
>
> PLEASE SUBMIT MORE TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION!
>
> Valete,
> Quintus
>
> -- 
> Blog: http://www.quintilianus.eu <http://www.quintilianus.eu/>
>
> I will reject HTML emails.    | Ich akzeptiere keine HTML-Nachrichten.
>                               |
> Use GnuPG for mail encryption: | GnuPG für Mail-Verschlüsselung:
> https://www.gnupg.org <https://www.gnupg.org/>        | 
> https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/GnuPG
> My key fingerprint:            | Mein Schlüsselabdruck:
> B1FE 958E D5E8 468E AA20      | B1FE 958E D5E8 468E AA20
> 8F4B F1D8 799F BCC8 BC4F      | 8F4B F1D8 799F BCC8 BC4F
>
>