Fw: Re: [tsc-devel] RFC: Voting rules draft

Quintus | Mon, 27 Jul 2015 09:35:38 UTC

[This e-mailed failed to parse properly. Below follows the raw message body.]

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain

DarkAceZ sent this to me personally, I forward it to the ML instead.

Vale,
Quintus


--=-=-=
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline

Return-Path: <…r@g…>
Delivered-To: <…s@q…>
Received: from troia.quintilianus.eu
	by troia.quintilianus.eu (Dovecot) with LMTP id S0RtF6mqs1VQDwAAC1rZVA
	for <…s@q…>; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 15:26:33 +0000
Received: from mail-ig0-x232.google.com (mail-ig0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::232])
	by troia.quintilianus.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5D4F9600A0
	for <…s@q…>; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 15:26:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by igr7 with SMTP id 7so34657277igr.0
        for <…s@q…>; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 08:26:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        bh=Kz/4Ui2BbisI99LAI4NVELxhVV2XgfD40kB2WCTK6iA=;
        b=lsAyBJUvCZr/yv4ljv6XMRY1XYSU+TD6M0XQ6GgPLQevERIcfftU8yoPkXAd2Q9tj1
         JB23fT6k4cHsc3Ulo+TPlHiAtS0QWCOAQgA6QO40BK8ogzkoxMb2j026+YkAGL972F4E
         CwFHRW6KCf1NXiJ0vovdlj/AHwbfTt/3f+vsQWDXrVEwnv00AKkgFI98tNtUvyKso552
         ahvw9Be3EwEtTvyT6kLPGeq79h5DsLXcb/g52pLpmw0jA7VvOFd6TODHG3YHMBaCWjwb
         9xkL48rO7Y+AD9y3vcVVCeU6x8XuDiT4S2X7Az4R6YTGMsb6Yhwdazjc3ojDytU3PdJO
         lqmQ==
X-Received: by 10.107.46.159 with SMTP id u31mr29139092iou.69.1437837990771;
 Sat, 25 Jul 2015 08:26:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.156.3 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 08:25:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87io9apzvk.fsf@hades.cable.internal.west-ik.de>
References: <87615gavth.fsf@hades.cable.internal.west-ik.de>
 <859086702.1427233.1437461304767.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
 <87wpxtqskw.fsf@hades.cable.internal.west-ik.de> <87io9apzvk.fsf@hades.cable.internal.west-ik.de>
From: Justin Rissler <…r@g…>
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 11:25:51 -0400
Message-ID: <…w@m…>
Subject: Re: [tsc-devel] RFC: Voting rules draft
To: Quintus <…s@q…>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="====-=-="

--====-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I'm currently lacking a home internet connection, but what I've read so far
sounds fine.
Will these polls be available for non-members to see? We might want to keep
in mind what they think while voting, if a majority of them lean towards
one option.

On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Quintus <…s@q…> wrote:

> Okay, if I see this correctly, then everyone is fine with voting rights
> being tied to the GitHub organisation. Can we postpone the question of
> whom to add/remove to/from the organisation until we have all agreed on
> the rest of the voting rules document then?
>
> Up until now no concerns other than the discussed one about the GitHub
> organisation membership have been raised. I=E2=80=99d like to see more pe=
ople
> taking part in this discussion, though, as the voting rules are
> something pretty fundamental for our continued development of the TSC
> project. I appreciate it if everyone likes my draft, but now is the time
> to properly discuss its fundamental outlines. Later changes will require
> a 2/3 majority among the team members, so if you don=E2=80=99t make your
> suggestions now, it=E2=80=99ll be difficult to get them in later.
>
> Once no further changes are suggested, I want ideally all people in the
> team to indicate that they=E2=80=99re fine with the document. The more ag=
reement
> is there, the better the foundation is.
>
> Valete,
> Quintus
>
> --
> #!/sbin/quintus
> Blog: http://www.guelkerdev.de
>
> GnuPG key: F1D8799FBCC8BC4F
>
>

--====-=-=
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">I&#39;m currently lacking a home internet connection, but =
what I&#39;ve read so far sounds fine.<div>Will these polls be available fo=
r non-members to see? We might want to keep in mind what they think while v=
oting, if a majority of them lean towards one option.</div></div><div class=
=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 1:0=
6 PM, Quintus <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:…s@q…
eu" target=3D"_blank">…s@q…</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blo=
ckquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #c=
cc solid;padding-left:1ex">Okay, if I see this correctly, then everyone is =
fine with voting rights<br>
being tied to the GitHub organisation. Can we postpone the question of<br>
whom to add/remove to/from the organisation until we have all agreed on<br>
the rest of the voting rules document then?<br>
<br>
Up until now no concerns other than the discussed one about the GitHub<br>
organisation membership have been raised. I=E2=80=99d like to see more peop=
le<br>
taking part in this discussion, though, as the voting rules are<br>
something pretty fundamental for our continued development of the TSC<br>
project. I appreciate it if everyone likes my draft, but now is the time<br>
to properly discuss its fundamental outlines. Later changes will require<br>
a 2/3 majority among the team members, so if you don=E2=80=99t make your<br>
suggestions now, it=E2=80=99ll be difficult to get them in later.<br>
<br>
Once no further changes are suggested, I want ideally all people in the<br>
team to indicate that they=E2=80=99re fine with the document. The more agre=
ement<br>
is there, the better the foundation is.<br>
<br>
Valete,<br>
<div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5">Quintus<br>
<br>
--<br>
#!/sbin/quintus<br>
Blog: <a href=3D"http://www.guelkerdev.de" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_bl=
ank">http://www.guelkerdev.de</a><br>
<br>
GnuPG key: F1D8799FBCC8BC4F<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>

--====-=-=--

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain



-- 
#!/sbin/quintus
Blog: http://www.guelkerdev.de

GnuPG key: F1D8799FBCC8BC4F

--=-=-=--