Re: [tsc-devel] CALL FOR VOTES: Voting rules document

Luiji Maryo | Tue, 01 Sep 2015 13:53:33 UTC

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I vote for Option 1: Accept the voting rules document.

On 09/01/2015 03:07 AM, Quintus wrote:
> 
> C A L L  F O R  V O T E S
> 
> 1st vote                                     September 1st, 2015
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> this is the formal call for votes (CfV) for the voting rules 
> document. The voting period is now open!
> 
> For your information again, this is the voting rules document draft
> we want to accept or reject:
> 
> http://team.secretchronicles.de/~quintus/votingrules/votingrules-2015-
08-15.pdf
>
>  Proponent °°°°°°°°°
> 
> The voting was proposed by me, Quintus <…s@q…>.
> 
> Vote subject °°°°°°°°°°°°
> 
> This vote is aimed at the ratification of the voting rules
> document itself.
> 
> Vote options °°°°°°°°°°°°
> 
> These are the possible voting options:
> 
> Option 1: Accept the voting rules document Option 2: Reject the
> voting rules document
> 
> Voting period °°°°°°°°°°°°°
> 
> The voting period is now open, and lasts until 2015-09-30 23:59 
> UTC.
> 
> Procedure °°°°°°°°°
> 
> As nobody (thankfully) requested a covert vote, this vote will be
> held as an open vote. Please vote by sending an email indicating
> the option you voted for to the mailinglist or make an according
> post to the forum topic corresponding to this message. Everybody
> has only one vote. If you have a GPG keypair, please use it to sign
> the message (this is optional, but recommended).
> 
> As per §1 of the voting rules, these are the people who are allowed
> to vote:
> 
> * brianvanderburg2 * DarkAceZ * datahead8888 * Luiji * Quintus *
> sauer2 * sydneyjd * xet7
> 
> Note this is a special vote as it has a specific majority
> requirement as per §21 of the voting rules document: At least two
> thirds of the team members must choose the acceptance option,
> otherwise the vote is failed. Conversely, if more than one third
> votes for the rejection option, the vote is also failed. In any
> case, we’ll have to revise the document then. If not enough people
> participate, we may vote on the same document without changes
> again.
> 
> From the above list you can surmise that eight people are allowed
> to vote, which means that 5 ⅓ people have to be in favour of the
> voting document. Since a third of a person is a little problematic,
> but 5 persons are not the required majority, at least 6 people must
> be in favour of it. In turn, if at least 3 people vote against the
> document, it is rejected.
> 
> Quintus TSC project lead.
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=OiYd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----