Re: [tsc-devel] SFML and further development process

Quintus | Tue, 06 Oct 2015 11:11:53 UTC

datahead <…r@f…> writes:
> think we should just highly
> encourage people to work on the SFML port, perhaps going so far as to
> ask someone who is contributing features if they would be willing to
> work on the SFML port.

I have doubts that this is enough. The SFML port is so complex nobody is
going to work on it voluntaryly, but it needs to be done. Thus, I think
it is required to systematically cut it down into pieces and then
resolve it step-by-step. If it is not tackled systematically, it will
take eternity to complete, with parts of it being overaged while others
still need to be written. Doing it all in one continuous effort will
prevent that. The usual, casual “I work on this or that” will not
suffice to get the SFML port completed.

Vale,
Quintus

-- 
#!/sbin/quintus
Blog: http://www.guelkerdev.de

GnuPG key: F1D8799FBCC8BC4F