Re: [tsc-devel] More on dependencies

Chris Jacobsen | Sun, 15 Oct 2017 20:50:43 UTC

> 2. For scripting, we'll continue to use mruby, which has some build
dependencies that we can safely ignore, because absolutely normal
software (like bison). No runtime dependencies.

If we reuse our existing C++ scripting implementation for mruby, I agree
it makes sense to stick with mruby.

Otherwise, I think it would be best to have a little discussion on
available scripting languages before finalizing the decision, in the
same way we have discussed general language options.

> Notably *not* in this list are:
* CEGUI and its plethora of subdependencies

I can certainly see why you would suggest not using CEGUI, though we
will need to identify an alternate choice before finalizing this
decision.  We either need to find another GUI library or plan on writing
our own.

The other suggestions seemed good.

-datahead