Re: [tsc-devel] Re: The abstract cScene class...

Quintus | Sat, 17 Oct 2015 08:06:43 UTC

datahead <…r@f…> writes:

> Post via forum by datahead <…9@x…>: I hadn't realized
> most of the derived classes were calling the base class
> implementations of the (currently empty) Scene methods.  If we make
> them pure virtual, though, I would probably say we should not have a
> default implementation for now if it is going to be empty.

I agree, make these functions purely virtual. It may happen later that
we want to implement behaviour that is common to all scenes, but in that
case we can just remove the purely virtual definition again.

Vale,
Quintus

-- 
#!/sbin/quintus
Blog: http://www.guelkerdev.de

GnuPG key: F1D8799FBCC8BC4F

By Thread
2015-10-16 22:36:33datahead[tsc-devel] The abstract cScene class...
2015-10-16 22:58:20datahead[tsc-devel] Re: The abstract cScene class...
2015-10-17 08:06:43QuintusRe: [tsc-devel] Re: The abstract cScene class...
2015-10-21 05:21:18datahead[tsc-devel] Re: The abstract cScene class...
By Date
[tsc-devel] The abstract cScene class...datahead2015-10-16 22:36:33
[tsc-devel] Re: The abstract cScene class...datahead2015-10-16 22:58:20
Re: [tsc-devel] Re: The abstract cScene class...Quintus2015-10-17 08:06:43
[tsc-devel] Re: The abstract cScene class...datahead2015-10-21 05:21:18